Barack Needs to Do Some 'Splainin

Can he?

His choice of Rick Warren to give the convocation at his Inauguration has everyone puzzled and pissed.

Everyone but Rick and himself, from what I can tell. 

Barney Frank decries the choice, as does Boltgirl, as does JordanCornblog.

Why go out of your way, Barack … to spotlight someone so abhorrent to a vital (and still very vulnerable) portion of your base?

Is this your homophobia leaking out?

What’s up, man?

Looking forward to your thoughtful response …

JordanCornblog


Discover more from JordanCornblog

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

This entry was posted in Civic Life and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Barack Needs to Do Some 'Splainin

  1. Paula Rockwell's avatar Paula Rockwell says:

    Wow, great posts to ponder. Alice, my heart responds to your posts, Stephen, your points make me think abit more on the subject. However, my bottom line is that I am disappointed in this particular choice. I was so looking forward to celebrating on January 20th, still am, but with a tinge of sadness.
    Thanks for the provocative posts.
    Paula

    Like

  2. Alice's avatar Alice says:

    Try as I might,Stephen, there’s no way I can equate the Warren choice as an indication of either a reasoned decision or a promising direction. Rick Warren equated gay marriage with incest and pedophilia. And he worked very visibly and very hard to pass the California ban. I don’t view those actions as either centrist or tolerant. My dismay with Obama is not that he would include Rick Warren or others with his views in talks or on committees–of course we need to include differing views if we’re to work on resolving differences. My disappointment is that he is giving such a visible and honored platform on this singularly important day to a man of such self-righteous intolerance. It still boggles my mind that he would choose Warren when there are many, many less divisive preachers around. Can you imagine Obama giving a Strom Thurmond or some other notable rascist a platform at his inaugeration? Hardly. Remember how Bill Clinton threw gay rights under the bus after he was elected with that demeaning don’t ask don’t tell policy. I’ve heard a number of gay activists say they feel similarly insulted with the Warren choice. Obama has surrounded himself with a lot of old Clintonites; I can only hope the platform he has voluntarily given to Rick Warren is not a symbol of how little he really cares about furthering and protecting gay rights and abortion rights.

    Like

  3. Stephen's avatar Stephen says:

    I’m sure this won’t be a popular opinion here or in many circles, but I have to say that I have no real problem with Rick Warren doing the invocation. And that’s not because I agree with his beliefs on many “wedge” issues! One thing that we all admired about Obama is his stated desire to be “everyone’s President.” The message throughout his campain was consistent: we are all in this together, we are one people, and this campaign is about inclusion. I know we’ve had 8 years of being on the outside while the right wing, neo-con, religio-fascists ran things solely for themselves and the like-minded. This has obviously made the more liberal-thinking, more-inclusive among us pretty upset and bitter. But Election ’08 was a clear repudiation of the tactics of the Sons of Atwater. Lets not let the lessons we learned during the uber-polarizing years of Dubya, Darth Vader, and K. Rove get tossed out with the bathwater.

    Rick Warren’s views on abortion rights, gay rights, etc. are miles away from my own — and from almost all democrats and many republicans. There also happen to be tens of millions of people in this country (sadly) who agree with him. By the accounts I have read, Rick Warren is fairly centrist. This excerpt from his Wikipedia entry (I know, I know) sums up what I have read from other sources:

    “Warren has challenged the conservative views of many evangelical leaders by devoting less attention to these (wedge) issues and instead calling on the church to focus its efforts on fighting international poverty and disease, expanding educational opportunity for the marginalized, and combatting global warming. He has thus worked to promote an evangelical movement that is more centrist rather than wedded to the Republican Party.”

    Do we discount this man’s work because he believes some things that we don’t?

    To me, Obama’s choice of Warren sends a very clear message to the 58+ million (!) people who voted for John McCain that his presidency will not be about vindication for the left, tit-for-tat, politics as usual, you had your chance, now we get ours. This choice says “I talked the talk during the election, and I will walk the walk during my administration.”

    Combined with his cabinet choices — which so far include 2 Republicans — Obama is showing that he truly is committed to uniting the country. This was a central theme in his acceptance speech at the DNC (which you really should read again):

    “This too is part of America’s promise – the promise of a democracy where we can find the strength and grace to bridge divides and unite in common effort.”

    I realize we’ve been outraged for so long that it has become second nature to find insult in anything that is not entirely lock-step with our own thinking. But if we follow that outrage to its natural conclusion, the boat tips all the way to the port side and the ship is once again in jeopardy of sinking.

    Like

  4. Alice's avatar Alice says:

    I’ve been trying to keep my expectations low re. Obama to prepare for just such a disappointment as the insulting choice of Rick Warren for the Invocation. I expect more disappointments to come, in particular the promised build-up and reliance on military force in Afhganistan that will kill more innocent people. We have to be real–Obama’s definition of change and mine–and your’s–for example, are hardly the same: he is a centrist politically and always has been. That’s not to say we shouldn’t make our outrage known. I really liked Jon Hoadley’s blog on this issue and his suggestions. (Thanks JordanCornblog for the link.) Here’s Hoadley’s final thought with which I concur: “…post your ideas on change.gov. Write to the Transition and Inaugural teams to share your disappoint with Rev. Warren, but couple it with suggestions for improvements.”

    Like

So, what do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.